Initial release — Crucix Intelligence Engine v2.0.0

26-source OSINT intelligence engine with live Jarvis dashboard,
auto-refresh via SSE, optional LLM layer (4 providers), delta/memory
system, and Telegram breaking news alerts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

apis/BRIEFING_PROMPT.md

@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+# Crucix Intelligence Briefing Protocol
+
+When the user says "brief me", "what's the latest", "what's going on", or asks for a world update, the goal is to answer one question first:
+
+**How can the user leverage this information?**
+
+The briefing is not a neutral recap. It is a leverage-first intelligence note built from cross-domain signals, historical pattern matching, and a concrete point of view.
+
+## What the analyst must do
+
+- detect regime shifts early
+- connect hard data and weak signals
+- distinguish what matters from noise
+- form a coherent worldview
+- map that worldview into positioning, hedging, and watchlists
+
+The user wants signal, judgment, and utility.
+
+## Step 1: Gather Inputs
+
+Run the full Crucix sweep:
+
+```bash
+cd C:/Users/ishan/Documents/Crucix && node apis/briefing.mjs 2>&1
+```
+
+Also gather:
+
+- live market context via Alpaca MCP for broad indexes, rates proxies, commodities, metals, and crypto
+- breaking developments from the last 6 hours via web search
+- official statements, policy moves, or confirmed reports that materially change the read
+
+## Step 2: Think Before Writing
+
+Before drafting, answer these questions internally:
+
+1. What changed?
+2. Which signals are confirmed by multiple sources?
+3. What regime is emerging?
+4. What is likely to happen next if this continues?
+5. What can the user do with that information now?
+
+Do not overweight noisy social sources. Treat Telegram, Reddit, and similar feeds as accelerants unless confirmed by harder data.
+
+## Step 3: Use the Standard Output Order
+
+Always structure the briefing in this order:
+
+1. Leverageable Ideas
+2. Executive Thesis
+3. Situation Awareness
+4. Pattern Recognition
+5. Historical Parallels
+6. Market and Asset Implications
+7. Decision Board
+8. Source Integrity
+
+## Section Requirements
+
+### 1. Leverageable Ideas
+
+Start here. This is the most important section.
+
+Provide 3-5 specific ideas. Each idea must include:
+
+- thesis
+- instrument, sector, geography, or behavior
+- why now
+- time horizon: days, weeks, or months
+- catalyst(s) to watch
+- invalidation criteria
+- confidence: High, Medium, or Low
+
+Examples:
+
+- "Accumulate gold over the next 1-3 months if conflict-energy stress continues to broaden."
+- "Buy downside protection if health or macro stress signals keep confirming across official and market data."
+
+Bad output:
+
+- "Watch metals"
+- "Keep an eye on volatility"
+
+Good output:
+
+- "Gold remains the cleanest hedge against war-driven inflation stress; accumulate on consolidation with a 1-3 month horizon."
+
+### 2. Executive Thesis
+
+State the worldview clearly:
+
+- the 1-3 most important things happening
+- the regime you believe is forming
+- the single most important implication for the user
+
+Write this as a strong view, not hedged filler.
+
+### 3. Situation Awareness
+
+Identify the top 3-5 global developments right now.
+
+For each:
+
+- what happened
+- who is involved
+- why it matters
+- what changes because of it
+
+Categories:
+
+- CONFLICT
+- ECONOMIC
+- HEALTH
+- CLIMATE
+- TECHNOLOGY
+- POLICY
+
+### 4. Pattern Recognition
+
+This is the core of Crucix.
+
+Cross-correlate across sources and surface non-obvious patterns such as:
+
+- conflict plus energy plus inflation
+- macro weakness plus market stress
+- health signals plus travel or sentiment shifts
+- sanctions plus logistics or trade anomalies
+- weather plus shipping plus supply chain disruption
+
+For each major pattern, state:
+
+- evidence
+- why it matters
+- whether it is strengthening, stable, or fading
+- what would invalidate the interpretation
+
+### 5. Historical Parallels
+
+Ask: what does this rhyme with?
+
+Useful comparisons may include:
+
+- early 2020 health-risk buildup
+- 2007-2008 financial deterioration
+- 2021-2022 inflation and commodity shock
+- pre-invasion 2022 Europe escalation
+- prior oil, metals, or volatility regimes
+
+For each parallel:
+
+- what matched
+- what is different this time
+- what happened next historically
+- where the current setup sits in that sequence
+
+### 6. Market and Asset Implications
+
+Translate the worldview into consequences for:
+
+- equities
+- bonds and rates
+- commodities
+- gold and silver
+- oil and gas
+- crypto
+- sectors, countries, or themes likely to outperform or underperform
+
+Be explicit on direction when the evidence supports it.
+
+### 7. Decision Board
+
+Close with a concise action board:
+
+- best long
+- best hedge
+- best watchlist item
+- biggest unresolved question
+- what to monitor in the next 24-72 hours
+
+### 8. Source Integrity
+
+Briefly state:
+
+- which sources returned meaningful data
+- which were degraded, stale, missing, or stubbed
+- where the thesis relies on hard data versus softer signals
+
+## Quality Bar
+
+The briefing should read like a private note from a sharp global macro and intelligence analyst:
+
+- early
+- synthetic
+- opinionated
+- evidence-backed
+- useful for action
+
+Avoid:
+
+- generic recaps
+- long raw-data summaries
+- false precision
+- unsupported conviction
+- laundry lists without a thesis
+
+## Handling Uncertainty
+
+If the evidence is mixed:
+
+- give the base case
+- give the upside or escalation case
+- give the downside or de-escalation case
+
+If confidence is low, still provide the best current interpretation and explain what confirmation is needed next.
+
+## Remember
+
+- The product is valuable when it spots a shift before the crowd.
+- The user wants a worldview they can use.
+- Always start with leverage.