Add scheduled repository cleanup workflow
This commit is contained in:
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ PROJECT_NAME: PROJECT_DESCRIPTION
|
||||
- When the project uses `blueprint.md` and `blueprint.json` for README generation, keep the rainbow `{{ template:section-line }}` divider between major README sections. Do not replace it with plain `---` unless the target renderer cannot display inline images.
|
||||
- If README blueprint files are changed, regenerate or update `README.md` in the same change and verify the generated output renders reasonably.
|
||||
- For releasable projects, add or preserve `.gitea/workflows/security-scan.yml` using `files/security-scan-gitea.yml` unless the repository already has equivalent scheduled security automation.
|
||||
- For active projects, add or preserve `.gitea/workflows/repo-cleanup.yml` using `files/repo-cleanup-gitea.yml` unless the repository already has equivalent cleanup checks.
|
||||
- Repository cleanup automation must be non-destructive. Do not delete branches, packages, releases, or tracked files without explicit user approval.
|
||||
|
||||
## Commands
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -56,6 +58,7 @@ ARTIFACT_NAME
|
||||
- Review `docs/security-review.md` before release work.
|
||||
- Fill `docs/security-review.md` with actual checked commands and results when performing release-readiness work.
|
||||
- Review scheduled security workflow failures before changing code. Treat matches as leads: they may be true positives, documentation examples, or test fixtures.
|
||||
- Review repository cleanup workflow failures as maintenance leads. Document intentional exceptions instead of blindly deleting files.
|
||||
- Treat generated credentials and config files as sensitive.
|
||||
- Keep external network calls documented.
|
||||
- Prefer local processing for user data.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user