From 583df3dd6ad850440f29d187368c5ed1483ad1c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: lekt8 Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 03:17:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Recognize gemma3/llama4/mistral-small3.1+/multimodal as vision models (#1430) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit is_vision_model() classified several genuinely multimodal families as text-only because their names contain neither "vision" nor "vl": Gemma 3 (4b+), Llama 4, Mistral Small 3.1/3.2, and *-multimodal models (e.g. phi-4-multimodal). For those the attached image was stripped before the request, so the model never saw it — a "can't read the image" report (issue #1274), common with Ollama tags like gemma3:4b. Add those keywords (plus a generic "multimodal"). Per the file's err-toward-True policy (#124), a rare text-only tag treated as vision is the safer failure than dropping a real image. Guard tests confirm the text-only siblings (gemma2, plain gemma, mistral-small, phi-3) are not over-matched. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) --- src/chat_helpers.py | 10 +++++++++- tests/test_vision_model_detection.py | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/chat_helpers.py b/src/chat_helpers.py index 6bb0611..52c2246 100644 --- a/src/chat_helpers.py +++ b/src/chat_helpers.py @@ -36,8 +36,16 @@ _VISION_MODEL_KEYWORDS = ( "gpt-4o", "gpt-4.1", "gpt-4.5", "gpt-4-turbo", "gpt-4-vision", "claude-sonnet", "claude-opus", "claude-haiku", "gemini", # open / local - "vision", "llava", "bakllava", "moondream", "pixtral", "minicpm", + "vision", "multimodal", "llava", "bakllava", "moondream", "pixtral", "minicpm", "internvl", "cogvlm", "qwen-vl", "qwen2-vl", "qwen3-vl", "qwen3vl", + # multimodal families whose names don't contain "vision"/"vl" but DO accept + # images — without these the image is silently dropped for common Ollama tags + # like gemma3:4b (issue #1274). Gemma 3 (4b+), Llama 4 (all), and Mistral + # Small 3.1/3.2 are vision-capable; per the err-toward-True policy (#124) a + # rare text-only tag (e.g. gemma3:1b) being treated as vision is the safer + # failure than dropping a real image. + "gemma-3", "gemma3", "llama-4", "llama4", + "mistral-small-3.1", "mistral-small3.1", "mistral-small-3.2", "mistral-small3.2", # zhipu / glm (glm-4.5v, glm-4.6v, glm-5v-turbo, etc.) "glm-4.5v", "glm-4.6v", "glm-5v", ) diff --git a/tests/test_vision_model_detection.py b/tests/test_vision_model_detection.py index b0efe68..cbc1f4e 100644 --- a/tests/test_vision_model_detection.py +++ b/tests/test_vision_model_detection.py @@ -28,3 +28,21 @@ def test_text_only_models_not_flagged(): def test_none_is_safe(): assert is_vision_model(None) is False + + +def test_recognizes_multimodal_families_without_vision_in_name(): + # issue #1274: these are vision-capable but their names don't contain + # "vision"/"vl", so they were dropped and the model never saw the image. + for name in [ + "gemma3:4b", "gemma3", "gemma-3-27b-it", + "llama4:scout", "llama4", "llama-4-maverick", + "mistral-small3.1", "mistral-small-3.2", + "phi-4-multimodal", "phi4-multimodal", + ]: + assert is_vision_model(name), f"{name!r} should be detected as vision-capable" + + +def test_new_keywords_do_not_overmatch_text_models(): + # The added families must not flag their text-only siblings. + for name in ["gemma2:9b", "gemma:7b", "llama3.3", "mistral-small", "phi-3-mini"]: + assert not is_vision_model(name), f"{name!r} should not be flagged as vision"