Files
odysseus/.github/scripts/check-issue-description.js
Povilas Kirna 68eeb7841c ci: harden description checks — unfilled dropdowns, gameable test plans, non-issue links (#2099)
* ci: harden description checks (dropdown placeholder, how-to-test, link \b)

- issue: flag sections still showing the "-- Please Select --" dropdown
  placeholder (added in #2068) as a single comma-separated line item;
  presence-only checks previously let an un-chosen dropdown pass.
- PR: replace the numbered-step "How to Test" rule with a non-trivial
  content requirement (>=30 chars). The old /\d+\.\s*\S/ rule both
  false-failed prose/code-block test plans and was gamed by an empty
  "1. 2. 3." shell; the message now explains what detail to provide.
- PR: tighten the linked-issue regex to /#\d+\b/ so a hex colour like
  #1a2b3c no longer counts as an issue reference.

---------

Co-authored-by: Povilas Kirna <povilas.kirna@pebble.net>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 08:16:36 +02:00

197 lines
7.4 KiB
JavaScript

// @ts-check
'use strict';
/** @param {{ github: import('@octokit/rest').Octokit, context: import('@actions/github').context, core: import('@actions/core') }} */
module.exports = async ({ github, context, core }) => {
const issue = context.payload.issue;
const body = (issue.body || '').trim();
const labels = issue.labels.map(l => l.name);
const owner = context.repo.owner;
const repo = context.repo.repo;
const isBug = labels.includes('bug');
const isFeature = labels.includes('enhancement');
// Extract a Section's text, stripping HTML comments. Matches any heading
// depth (#, ##, ###, …) so a manually-written body isn't penalised for
// using a different number of hashes than the issue form generates.
function section(heading) {
const re = new RegExp(`#+\\s+${heading}\\s*([\\s\\S]*?)(?=\\n#+\\s+|$)`, 'i');
const m = body.match(re);
return m ? m[1].replace(/<!--[\s\S]*?-->/g, '').trim() : '';
}
const failures = [];
// ── Common: body must exist ───────────────────────────────────────────────
if (body.length < 50) {
failures.push(
'**Description** — body is empty or too short. ' +
'Please open the issue using one of the provided templates.',
);
}
// An issue is one or the other — never both. Resolve to a single type so the
// validation can't run two conflicting blocks at once.
const type = isBug && isFeature ? 'conflict' : isBug ? 'bug' : isFeature ? 'feature' : 'untyped';
switch (type) {
case 'conflict':
failures.push('**Labels** — an issue cannot be both `bug` and `enhancement`. Remove one label.');
break;
case 'bug': {
if (!section('Install Method')) {
failures.push('**Install Method** — select how you installed Odysseus');
}
if (!section('Operating System')) {
failures.push('**Operating System** — select your OS');
}
const stepsText = section('Steps to Reproduce');
if (!stepsText || !/\d+\.|[-*]/.test(stepsText)) {
failures.push('**Steps to Reproduce** — must include at least one numbered or bulleted step');
}
if (section('Expected Behaviour').length < 10) {
failures.push('**Expected Behaviour** — section is empty or too short');
}
if (section('Actual Behaviour').length < 10) {
failures.push('**Actual Behaviour** — section is empty or too short');
}
break;
}
case 'feature':
if (!section('Area')) {
failures.push('**Area** — select which part of the application this affects');
}
if (section('Problem or Motivation').length < 20) {
failures.push(
'**Problem or Motivation** — section is empty or too short ' +
'(explain the concrete problem this solves)',
);
}
if (section('Proposed Solution').length < 20) {
failures.push(
'**Proposed Solution** — section is empty or too short ' +
'(describe the change you want to see)',
);
}
if (!section('Are you willing to implement this\\?')) {
failures.push('**Are you willing to implement this?** — select an option');
}
break;
// 'untyped' → only the common body-length check applies.
}
// ── Unfilled dropdowns ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// #2068 added a "-- Please Select --" default to every template dropdown, so
// a contributor who never opens the dropdown submits with that literal string
// as the section value. The per-section checks above only verify presence, so
// a placeholder value passes. Scan every section and flag the ones still
// showing the placeholder, as a single comma-separated line item.
const PLACEHOLDER = '-- Please Select --';
const headingRe = /^#+\s+(.+?)\s*$/gm;
const headings = [];
let headingMatch;
while ((headingMatch = headingRe.exec(body)) !== null) {
headings.push({
name: headingMatch[1].trim(),
headStart: headingMatch.index,
contentStart: headingMatch.index + headingMatch[0].length,
});
}
const unfilled = [];
for (let i = 0; i < headings.length; i++) {
const end = i + 1 < headings.length ? headings[i + 1].headStart : body.length;
if (body.slice(headings[i].contentStart, end).includes(PLACEHOLDER)) {
unfilled.push(headings[i].name);
}
}
if (unfilled.length > 0) {
failures.push(
`**Unfilled dropdowns** — please choose a value; these sections still show ` +
`the \`${PLACEHOLDER}\` placeholder: ${unfilled.join(', ')}.`,
);
}
// ── Labels ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// These labels are expected to already exist in the repo — managing the
// repo's label set is the maintainer's job, not this workflow's. We check a
// label exists before applying it (issues.addLabels would otherwise silently
// create a missing label) and fail soft — warn and skip — if it's absent.
async function labelExists(name) {
try {
await github.rest.issues.getLabel({ owner, repo, name });
return true;
} catch (e) {
if (e.status === 404) return false;
throw e;
}
}
async function addLabel(name) {
if (await labelExists(name)) {
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner, repo, issue_number: issue.number, labels: [name] });
} else {
core.warning(`Label "${name}" does not exist in the repo — skipping. Create it once to enable labelling.`);
}
}
async function dropLabel(name) {
try {
await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({ owner, repo, issue_number: issue.number, name });
} catch (e) {
if (e.status !== 404 && e.status !== 410) throw e;
}
}
// ── Find existing bot comment to update in-place ──────────────────────────
const MARKER = '<!-- issue-description-check -->';
const { data: comments } = await github.rest.issues.listComments({
owner, repo, issue_number: issue.number,
});
const existing = comments.find(c => c.user.type === 'Bot' && c.body.includes(MARKER));
const LABEL_BAD = 'needs more info';
const LABEL_GOOD = 'ready for review';
if (failures.length === 0) {
if (existing) {
await github.rest.issues.deleteComment({ owner, repo, comment_id: existing.id });
}
await dropLabel(LABEL_BAD);
await addLabel(LABEL_GOOD);
} else {
const list = failures.map(f => `- ${f}`).join('\n');
const commentBody = [
MARKER,
'⚠️ **Issue description is incomplete.** Please update the following sections:',
'',
list,
'',
'_This comment is deleted automatically once all sections are complete._',
].join('\n');
if (existing) {
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({ owner, repo, comment_id: existing.id, body: commentBody });
} else {
await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner, repo, issue_number: issue.number, body: commentBody });
}
await dropLabel(LABEL_GOOD);
await addLabel(LABEL_BAD);
core.setFailed(`Issue description has ${failures.length} issue(s) — see bot comment for details.`);
}
};