* ci: add issue/PR description completeness checks (#1958) Two github-script workflows that validate description structure on issue/PR open/edit/reopen, for submissions that bypass the browser template (API, gh CLI, agent bulk PRs). - PR check: Summary, Linked Issue, Type of Change, duplicate-search box, How to Test. - Issue check: body length + per-label bug/enhancement fields, plus a bug+enhancement conflict guard. - Pass deletes any prior bot comment and applies `ready for review`; fail posts an in-place comment, fails the check, and applies `needs work` (PRs) / `needs more info` (issues). - References existing labels only — never creates or recolours repo labels (checks existence first, warns and skips if absent). - Safe pull_request_target: checkout pinned to the base ref, sparse `.github/scripts` only; PR head never checked out. Closes #1958 Co-authored-by: Povilas Kirna <povilas.kirna@pebble.net> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
122 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
122 lines
5.1 KiB
JavaScript
// @ts-check
|
|
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/** @param {{ github: import('@octokit/rest').Octokit, context: import('@actions/github').context, core: import('@actions/core') }} */
|
|
module.exports = async ({ github, context, core }) => {
|
|
const body = context.payload.pull_request.body || '';
|
|
const prNum = context.payload.pull_request.number;
|
|
const MARKER = '<!-- pr-description-check-bot -->';
|
|
const owner = context.repo.owner;
|
|
const repo = context.repo.repo;
|
|
|
|
// Strip HTML comments so placeholder text does not count as content.
|
|
function strip(text) {
|
|
return (text ?? '').replace(/<!--[\s\S]*?-->/g, '').trim();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Extract the text content of a Section. Matches any heading depth (#, ##,
|
|
// ###, …) so the check doesn't break if the template's heading level changes.
|
|
function section(heading) {
|
|
const m = body.match(new RegExp(`#+\\s+${heading}[\\s\\S]*?(?=\\n#+\\s+|$)`, 'i'));
|
|
return strip(m?.[0].replace(new RegExp(`#+\\s+${heading}`, 'i'), '') ?? '');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const problems = [];
|
|
|
|
// 1. Summary must be filled in.
|
|
if (section('Summary').length < 20) {
|
|
problems.push('**Summary** is empty or too short — describe what changed and why.');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 2. Linked Issue must reference a real issue. Accept a bare #NNN, a closing
|
|
// keyword + #NNN, or a full issue URL (e.g. .../issues/123) — the strict
|
|
// keyword-prefixed form previously false-flagged correctly-linked PRs.
|
|
const linkedSection = section('Linked Issue');
|
|
const hasIssueRef = /#\d+/.test(linkedSection) || /\/issues\/\d+/.test(linkedSection);
|
|
if (!linkedSection || !hasIssueRef) {
|
|
problems.push('**Linked Issue** — add a reference like `Fixes #NNN`, a bare `#NNN`, or a link to the issue.');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 3. At least one Type of Change box must be checked.
|
|
const typeBlock = body.match(/##\s+Type of Change[\s\S]*?(?=\n##\s|$)/i)?.[0] ?? '';
|
|
if (!/- \[x\]/i.test(typeBlock)) {
|
|
problems.push('**Type of Change** — check at least one box.');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 4. Duplicate-search checklist item must be checked.
|
|
if (!/- \[x\] I searched/i.test(body)) {
|
|
problems.push('**Checklist** — check the duplicate-search box to confirm you searched existing issues and PRs.');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// 5. How to Test must have at least one numbered step.
|
|
const howTo = section('How to Test');
|
|
if (!howTo || !/\d+\.\s*\S/.test(howTo)) {
|
|
problems.push('**How to Test** — add at least one numbered step a reviewer can follow to verify this works.');
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Comment ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
const comments = await github.paginate(github.rest.issues.listComments, {
|
|
owner, repo, issue_number: prNum, per_page: 100,
|
|
});
|
|
const existing = comments.find(c => (c.body ?? '').includes(MARKER));
|
|
|
|
if (problems.length === 0) {
|
|
if (existing) {
|
|
await github.rest.issues.deleteComment({ owner, repo, comment_id: existing.id });
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
const commentBody = [
|
|
MARKER,
|
|
'⚠️ **PR description — action needed**',
|
|
'',
|
|
'The following required sections are missing or incomplete. Please update the PR description to address them:',
|
|
'',
|
|
problems.map(p => `- ${p}`).join('\n'),
|
|
'',
|
|
'---',
|
|
'_This comment is deleted automatically once all sections are complete._',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
if (existing) {
|
|
await github.rest.issues.updateComment({ owner, repo, comment_id: existing.id, body: commentBody });
|
|
} else {
|
|
await github.rest.issues.createComment({ owner, repo, issue_number: prNum, body: commentBody });
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ── Labels ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
// These labels are expected to already exist in the repo — managing the
|
|
// repo's label set is the maintainer's job, not this workflow's. We check a
|
|
// label exists before applying it (issues.addLabels would otherwise silently
|
|
// create a missing label) and fail soft — warn and skip — if it's absent.
|
|
async function labelExists(name) {
|
|
try {
|
|
await github.rest.issues.getLabel({ owner, repo, name });
|
|
return true;
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
if (e.status === 404) return false;
|
|
throw e;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
async function swapLabel(num, add, remove) {
|
|
if (await labelExists(add)) {
|
|
await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ owner, repo, issue_number: num, labels: [add] });
|
|
} else {
|
|
core.warning(`Label "${add}" does not exist in the repo — skipping. Create it once to enable labelling.`);
|
|
}
|
|
try {
|
|
await github.rest.issues.removeLabel({ owner, repo, issue_number: num, name: remove });
|
|
} catch (e) {
|
|
if (e.status !== 404 && e.status !== 410) throw e;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (problems.length === 0) {
|
|
await swapLabel(prNum, 'ready for review', 'needs work');
|
|
} else {
|
|
await swapLabel(prNum, 'needs work', 'ready for review');
|
|
core.setFailed(`PR description has ${problems.length} issue(s) — see bot comment for details.`);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|